Namewise

Beate vs Marlene

Beate and Marlenecompared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • Norway · Girls

    In 2017, Beate was ranked #523 and Marlene #434 among girls in Norway.

  • England and Wales · Girls

    In 2018, Beate was ranked #5666 and Marlene #3985 among girls in England and Wales.

Beate and Marlene over time

Beate and Marlene appear together in 1 published list, across 41 years of shared records. Marlene held the stronger position in more years in 1 of them, Beate in 0.

The order between them changed and held in one of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Beate reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 1 of those lists, and Marlene in none. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

How this pair is related

The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.

List by list

  • Norway · Girls41 shared years, 19672017

    Beate held the stronger position in 17 of those years, Marlene in 24.

    Highest recorded here: Beate #51 in 1972, Marlene #91 in 1987.

    The order changed in 1992: Marlene moved ahead. In 1991 they stood at #134 and #159; by 1992 that had become #175 and #133.

    Most recent shared year, 2017: Beate #523, Marlene #434.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Beate, Marlene
FieldBeateMarlene
Record typeOfficial statistical record (evidence-only)Official statistical record (evidence-only)
Gender usagefemalefemale
MeaningNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
OriginNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Pronunciation
Syllables23
Common variants / nicknamesNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Recorded regional usageGB-ENW, NOGB-ENW, IE, NO
Most recent popularity observationEngland and Wales · Girls #5666 (2018)Norway · Girls #516 (2025)
Pronunciation clarity (demonstration score)Not yet recordedNot yet recorded
Spelling simplicity (demonstration score)94/10082/100
International familiarity (demonstration score)60/100100/100
Data Confidencemediummedium

What the data shows

  • Beate has 2 syllables, compared with 3 for Marlene.
  • Both names have recorded usage in GB-ENW, NO.

How each name got here

Beate

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1945

    First recorded at #270 among girls in Norway in 1945 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Girls

  2. Highest recorded1945–2017

    Highest recorded position: #47 among girls in Norway, in 1977 (recorded 1945–2017).

    Norway · Girls

  3. Most recent2017

    Most recently recorded at #523 among girls in Norway, in 2017.

    Norway · Girls

Marlene

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1967

    First recorded at #519 among girls in Norway in 1967 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Girls

  2. Highest recorded1967–2025

    Highest recorded position: #91 among girls in Norway, in 1987 (recorded 1967–2025).

    Norway · Girls

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #516 among girls in Norway, in 2025.

    Norway · Girls