Namewise

Cecil vs Kim

Cecil and Kimcompared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • Republic of Ireland · Girls

    In 1964, Cecil was ranked #300 and Kim #206 among girls in Republic of Ireland.

  • Republic of Ireland · Boys

    In 1978, Cecil was ranked #326 and Kim #326 among boys in Republic of Ireland.

  • England and Wales · Boys

    In 2015, Cecil was ranked #3004 and Kim #4747 among boys in England and Wales.

Cecil and Kim over time

Cecil and Kim appear together in 1 published list, across 9 years of shared records. Neither was ahead in more lists than the other.

The order between them changed and held in one of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Kim reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 1 of those lists, and Cecil in none. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

List by list

  • England and Wales · Boys9 shared years, 19962015

    Cecil held the stronger position in 4 of those years, Kim in 4.

    Highest recorded here: Cecil #1889 in 2000, Kim #1168 in 1996.

    The order changed in 2015: Cecil moved ahead. In 2014 they stood at #4685 and #3822; by 2015 that had become #3004 and #4747.

    Most recent shared year, 2015: Cecil #3004, Kim #4747.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Where to go next

Comparisons that share a name, a rule or a published list with this one. Each is an existing comparison page with its own evidence — nothing here says these pairs are alike.

Other comparisons involving Kim

Pairs where Kim shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Cecil, Kim
FieldCecilKim
Record typeOfficial statistical record (evidence-only)Official statistical record (evidence-only)
Gender usagemaleUsed for both boys and girls
MeaningNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
OriginNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
PronunciationNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Syllables21
Common variants / nicknamesNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Recorded regional usageGB-ENW, IEAU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, IE, NO, NZ
Most recent popularity observationEngland and Wales · Boys #2813 (2023)Republic of Ireland · Girls #736 (2024)
Pronunciation clarity (demonstration score)Not yet recordedNot yet recorded
Spelling simplicity (demonstration score)94/10095/100
International familiarity (demonstration score)60/100100/100
Data Confidencemediummedium

What the data shows

  • Cecil has 2 syllables, compared with 1 for Kim.
  • Both names have recorded usage in GB-ENW, IE.

How each name got here

Cecil

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1965

    First recorded at #181 among boys in Republic of Ireland in 1965 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Republic of Ireland · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1965–1988

    Highest recorded position: #181 among boys in Republic of Ireland, in 1965 (recorded 1965–1988).

    Republic of Ireland · Boys

  3. Most recent2023

    Most recently recorded at #2813 among boys in England and Wales, in 2023.

    England and Wales · Boys

Kim

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1951

    First recorded at #344 among girls in Norway in 1951 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Girls

  2. Highest recorded1958–1985

    Highest recorded position: #5 among girls in New Zealand, in 1968 (recorded 1958–1985).

    New Zealand · Girls

  3. Most recent2024

    Most recently recorded at #4192 among girls in England and Wales, in 2024.

    England and Wales · Girls