Chloe vs Ruby
Chloe and Rubycompared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.
Head to head
Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.
New South Wales, Australia · Girls
In 2025, Chloe was ranked #7 and Ruby #28 among girls in New South Wales, Australia.
New Zealand · Girls
In 2023, Chloe was ranked #23 and Ruby #17 among girls in New Zealand.
Republic of Ireland · Girls
In 2025, Chloe was ranked #22 and Ruby #36 among girls in Republic of Ireland.
Scotland · Girls
In 2024, Chloe was ranked #39 and Ruby #34 among girls in Scotland.
England and Wales · Girls
In 2025, Chloe was ranked #89 and Ruby #38 among girls in England and Wales.
Northern Ireland · Girls
In 2024, Chloe was ranked #105 and Ruby #38 among girls in Northern Ireland.
Norway · Girls
In 2025, Chloe was ranked #341 and Ruby #450 among girls in Norway.
Chloe and Ruby over time
Chloe and Ruby appear together in 5 published lists, across 150 years of shared records. Chloe held the stronger position in more years in 3 of them, Ruby in 2.
The order between them changed and held in 3 of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.
Chloe reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 5 of those lists, and Ruby in none. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.
Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.
How this pair is related
The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.
- One moved ahead of the other
In 2017, Ruby moved ahead of Chloe in England and Wales · Girls — #23 and #26 the year before became #32 and #29.
- Repeatedly exchanged positions
Chloe and Ruby changed places 15 times in New Zealand · Girls between 1992 and 2023, ending at #23 and #17.
- Closest over the longest run
Across 30 shared years in England and Wales · Girls, Chloe and Ruby averaged 30.5 places apart, ending at #89 and #38.
- Longest-running competitions
Chloe and Ruby were both ranked in England and Wales · Girls for 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, ending at #89 and #38.
- Peaked in the same years
Both reached their highest recorded position in New Zealand · Girls within 2 years — Chloe #8 in 2010, Ruby #1 in 2011.
List by list
Republic of Ireland · Girls34 shared years, 1991–2025
Chloe held the stronger position in 34 of those years, Ruby in 0.
Highest recorded here: Chloe #1 in 1998, Ruby #16 in 2013.
The order between them never changed and held in this list.
Most recent shared year, 2025: Chloe #22, Ruby #36.
England and Wales · Girls30 shared years, 1996–2025
Chloe held the stronger position in 11 of those years, Ruby in 19.
Highest recorded here: Chloe #1 in 1997, Ruby #1 in 2007.
The order changed in 2017: Ruby moved ahead. In 2016 they stood at #23 and #26; by 2017 that had become #32 and #29.
Most recent shared year, 2025: Chloe #89, Ruby #38.
New Zealand · Girls30 shared years, 1992–2023
Chloe held the stronger position in 12 of those years, Ruby in 18.
Highest recorded here: Chloe #8 in 2010, Ruby #1 in 2011.
The order changed in 2022: Ruby moved ahead. In 2021 they stood at #17 and #19; by 2022 that had become #16 and #15.
Most recent shared year, 2023: Chloe #23, Ruby #17.
New South Wales, Australia · Girls29 shared years, 1997–2025
Chloe held the stronger position in 28 of those years, Ruby in 1.
Highest recorded here: Chloe #1 in 2006, Ruby #2 in 2011.
The order between them never changed and held in this list.
Most recent shared year, 2025: Chloe #7, Ruby #28.
Northern Ireland · Girls27 shared years, 1998–2024
Chloe held the stronger position in 18 of those years, Ruby in 9.
Highest recorded here: Chloe #1 in 1998, Ruby #18 in 2011.
The order changed in 2017: Ruby moved ahead. In 2016 they stood at #22 and #27; by 2017 that had become #28 and #27.
Most recent shared year, 2024: Chloe #105, Ruby #38.
Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.
Where to go next
Comparisons that share a name, a rule or a published list with this one. Each is an existing comparison page with its own evidence — nothing here says these pairs are alike.
Other comparisons involving Chloe
Pairs where Chloe shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.
- Chloe vs Katie
In 1996 they stood at #2 and #12 in England and Wales · Girls, 10 places apart; by 2025 they were #89 and #650.
Chloe · Katie · 30 shared years, 1996–2025 · Started together, ended far apart
- Chloe vs Aisling
Both reached their highest recorded position in Northern Ireland · Girls within 2 years — Chloe #1 in 1997, Aisling #60 in 1998.
Chloe · Aisling · 26 shared years, 1997–2022 · Peaked in the same years
- Chloe vs Alexandra
Both reached their highest recorded position in England and Wales · Girls within 2 years — Chloe #1 in 1997, Alexandra #38 in 1996.
Chloe · Alexandra · 30 shared years, 1996–2025 · Peaked in the same years
- Chloe vs Alyssa
Both reached their highest recorded position in New South Wales, Australia · Girls within 2 years — Chloe #1 in 2006, Alyssa #25 in 2004.
Chloe · Alyssa · 23 shared years, 1990–2019 · Peaked in the same years
Other comparisons involving Ruby
Pairs where Ruby shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.
- Ruby vs Stacey
In 1996 they stood at #103 and #97 in England and Wales · Girls, 6 places apart; by 2025 they were #38 and #2138.
Ruby · Stacey · 30 shared years, 1996–2025 · Started together, ended far apart
- Ruby vs Charlie
In 1996 they stood at #103 and #113 in England and Wales · Girls, 10 places apart; by 2025 they were #38 and #747.
Ruby · Charlie · 30 shared years, 1996–2025 · Started together, ended far apart
- Olivia vs Ruby
Olivia and Ruby both rose over the same years in 5 registrars — England and Wales · Girls; New South Wales, Australia · Girls; New Zealand · Girls; Northern Ireland · Girls; Republic of Ireland · Girls. Each list is measured against its own starting position; the positions are never combined.
Olivia · Ruby · 35 shared years, 1991–2025 · Moved together in several countries
- Ruby vs Zara
Ruby and Zara both rose over the same years in 4 registrars — England and Wales · Girls; New Zealand · Girls; Northern Ireland · Girls; Republic of Ireland · Girls. Each list is measured against its own starting position; the positions are never combined.
Ruby · Zara · 34 shared years, 1991–2025 · Moved together in several countries
Other pairs with the same kind of relationship
Pairs that qualify under the same rule as this one — repeatedly exchanged positions.
- Frank vs Vidar
Frank and Vidar changed places 36 times in Norway · Boys between 1945 and 2025, ending at #459 and #478.
Frank · Vidar · 77 shared years, 1945–2025 · Repeatedly exchanged positions
- Helge vs Rolf
Helge and Rolf changed places 35 times in Norway · Boys between 1945 and 2025, ending at #352 and #437.
Helge · Rolf · 81 shared years, 1945–2025 · Repeatedly exchanged positions
- Stein vs Arild
Stein and Arild changed places 34 times in Norway · Boys between 1945 and 2014, ending at #452 and #408.
Stein · Arild · 67 shared years, 1945–2014 · Repeatedly exchanged positions
- Inger vs Kari
Inger and Kari changed places 33 times in Norway · Girls between 1945 and 2025, ending at #292 and #222.
Inger · Kari · 81 shared years, 1945–2025 · Repeatedly exchanged positions
Other pairs from New Zealand lists
Pairs measured inside New Zealand's own published lists, where this pair's strongest relationship is also recorded. Positions in these lists are not comparable with another registrar's.
- George vs Patrick
Over 64 shared years in New Zealand · Boys, George rose about as far as Patrick fell — from #50 and #60 in 1954 to #6 and #93 in 2020.
George · Patrick · 64 shared years, 1954–2020 · Mirrored each other
- Patrick vs Alexander
Over 56 shared years in New Zealand · Boys, Alexander rose about as far as Patrick fell — from #60 and #73 in 1954 to #93 and #32 in 2020.
Patrick · Alexander · 56 shared years, 1954–2020 · Mirrored each other
- James vs Timothy
Over 52 shared years in New Zealand · Boys, James rose about as far as Timothy fell — from #20 and #61 in 1954 to #5 and #100 in 2005.
James · Timothy · 52 shared years, 1954–2005 · Mirrored each other
- Joseph vs Timothy
Over 52 shared years in New Zealand · Boys, Joseph rose about as far as Timothy fell — from #66 and #61 in 1954 to #27 and #100 in 2005.
Joseph · Timothy · 52 shared years, 1954–2005 · Mirrored each other
Other pairs ranked together in the 2020s
Pairs both ranked in the same published list at some point between 2020 and 2029.
- Grace vs Gemma
In 1996 they stood at #41 and #50 in England and Wales · Girls, 9 places apart; by 2025 they were #27 and #4867.
Grace · Gemma · 30 shared years, 1996–2025 · Started together, ended far apart
- Ella vs Gemma
In 1996 they stood at #56 and #50 in England and Wales · Girls, 6 places apart; by 2025 they were #46 and #4867.
Ella · Gemma · 30 shared years, 1996–2025 · Started together, ended far apart
- Jasmine vs Gemma
In 1996 they stood at #55 and #50 in England and Wales · Girls, 5 places apart; by 2025 they were #102 and #4867.
Jasmine · Gemma · 30 shared years, 1996–2025 · Started together, ended far apart
- Anna vs Gemma
In 1996 they stood at #47 and #50 in England and Wales · Girls, 3 places apart; by 2025 they were #142 and #4867.
Anna · Gemma · 30 shared years, 1996–2025 · Started together, ended far apart
Side by side
| Field | Chloe | Ruby |
|---|---|---|
| Record type | Editorially researched profile | Editorially researched profile |
| Gender usage | female | female |
| Meaning | Commonly interpreted as 'green shoot', referring to new plant growth in spring; used as an epithet of the Greek goddess Demeter. | Taken from the gemstone name; the ruby is the traditional July birthstone. As a given name it came into use in the 16th century. |
| Origin | Ancient Greek | English, ultimately from Latin rubeus ('red') |
| Pronunciation | /ˈkloʊi/ | /ˈruːbi/ |
| Syllables | 1 | 2 |
| Common variants / nicknames | Not yet recorded | Not yet recorded |
| Recorded regional usage | AU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZ | AU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZ |
| Most recent popularity observation | New South Wales, Australia · Girls #7 (2025) | New South Wales, Australia · Girls #28 (2025) |
| Pronunciation clarity (demonstration score) | 90/100 | 90/100 |
| Spelling simplicity (demonstration score) | 94/100 | 95/100 |
| International familiarity (demonstration score) | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Data Confidence | medium | medium |
What the data shows
- Chloe is recorded with a Ancient Greek origin, while Ruby is recorded with a English, ultimately from Latin rubeus ('red') origin.
- Chloe has 1 syllable, compared with 2 for Ruby.
- Chloe's recorded meaning differs from Ruby's — see the table above for each.
- Both names have recorded usage in AU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZ.
How each name got here
Chloe
Popularity journey
First recorded1974
First recorded at #490 among girls in Republic of Ireland in 1974 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.
Republic of Ireland · Girls
Highest recorded1996–2025
Highest recorded position: #1 among girls in England and Wales, in 1997 (recorded 1996–2025).
England and Wales · Girls
Most recent2025
Most recently recorded at #89 among girls in England and Wales, in 2025.
England and Wales · Girls
Ruby
Popularity journey
First recorded1991
First recorded at #515 among girls in Republic of Ireland in 1991 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.
Republic of Ireland · Girls
Highest recorded1996–2025
Highest recorded position: #1 among girls in England and Wales, in 2007 (recorded 1996–2025).
England and Wales · Girls
Most recent2025
Most recently recorded at #38 among girls in England and Wales, in 2025.
England and Wales · Girls