Namewise

Craig vs Marcus

Craig and Marcus compared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Boys

    In 1973, Craig was ranked #13 and Marcus #98 among boys in New South Wales, Australia.

  • New Zealand · Boys

    In 1991, Craig was ranked #62 and Marcus #96 among boys in New Zealand.

  • Northern Ireland · Boys

    In 2015, Craig was ranked #415 and Marcus #156 among boys in Northern Ireland.

  • Republic of Ireland · Boys

    In 2023, Craig was ranked #516 and Marcus #172 among boys in Republic of Ireland.

  • Scotland · Boys

    In 2024, Craig was ranked #478 and Marcus #176 among boys in Scotland.

  • England and Wales · Boys

    In 2025, Craig was ranked #1705 and Marcus #267 among boys in England and Wales.

Craig and Marcus over time

Republic of Ireland · Boys
#100#30019642023Craig #516Marcus #1721964: Craig #214, Marcus #1361965: Craig #250, Marcus #1941966: Craig #256, Marcus #1591967: Craig #245, Marcus #1441968: Craig #207, Marcus #1371969: Craig #216, Marcus #1541970: Craig #235, Marcus #1111971: Craig #159, Marcus #1071972: Craig #158, Marcus #991973: Craig #176, Marcus #1131974: Craig #173, Marcus #1161975: Craig #216, Marcus #1201976: Craig #190, Marcus #1291977: Craig #159, Marcus #1241978: Craig #198, Marcus #1441979: Craig #158, Marcus #1231980: Craig #163, Marcus #1261981: Craig #142, Marcus #1501982: Craig #113, Marcus #2051983: Craig #109, Marcus #1361984: Craig #87, Marcus #1281985: Craig #91, Marcus #1551986: Craig #91, Marcus #1461987: Craig #83, Marcus #1411988: Craig #67, Marcus #1411989: Craig #54, Marcus #1291990: Craig #39, Marcus #1521991: Craig #40, Marcus #1541992: Craig #44, Marcus #1381993: Craig #48, Marcus #1481994: Craig #44, Marcus #1491995: Craig #47, Marcus #1681996: Craig #50, Marcus #1451997: Craig #46, Marcus #1581998: Craig #50, Marcus #1621999: Craig #49, Marcus #1412000: Craig #49, Marcus #1552001: Craig #40, Marcus #1482002: Craig #59, Marcus #1742003: Craig #63, Marcus #1302004: Craig #72, Marcus #1422005: Craig #89, Marcus #1812006: Craig #85, Marcus #1442007: Craig #112, Marcus #1582008: Craig #126, Marcus #1912009: Craig #173, Marcus #2142010: Craig #171, Marcus #1782011: Craig #232, Marcus #1702012: Craig #215, Marcus #1822013: Craig #229, Marcus #1842014: Craig #286, Marcus #1752015: Craig #257, Marcus #2062016: Craig #345, Marcus #1962017: Craig #356, Marcus #1622018: Craig #572, Marcus #2312019: Craig #646, Marcus #2682020: Craig #637, Marcus #3072022: Craig #509, Marcus #2192023: Craig #516, Marcus #172

Higher on the chart is a stronger position. The scale is logarithmic, so the gap from #1 to #10 is drawn as large as the gap from #100 to #1,000.

England and Wales · Boys
#100#300#100019962025Craig #1705Marcus #2671996: Craig #81, Marcus #851997: Craig #91, Marcus #881998: Craig #107, Marcus #881999: Craig #122, Marcus #932000: Craig #121, Marcus #952001: Craig #127, Marcus #832002: Craig #158, Marcus #922003: Craig #187, Marcus #1002004: Craig #222, Marcus #1202005: Craig #243, Marcus #1272006: Craig #330, Marcus #1192007: Craig #381, Marcus #1152008: Craig #444, Marcus #1272009: Craig #408, Marcus #1532010: Craig #503, Marcus #1572011: Craig #557, Marcus #1702012: Craig #577, Marcus #1672013: Craig #771, Marcus #1742014: Craig #670, Marcus #2162015: Craig #821, Marcus #1942016: Craig #1157, Marcus #2052017: Craig #1124, Marcus #2552018: Craig #1786, Marcus #2362019: Craig #1217, Marcus #2452020: Craig #1492, Marcus #2402021: Craig #1688, Marcus #2472022: Craig #1692, Marcus #2302023: Craig #2325, Marcus #2352024: Craig #2263, Marcus #2332025: Craig #1705, Marcus #267

Higher on the chart is a stronger position. The scale is logarithmic, so the gap from #1 to #10 is drawn as large as the gap from #100 to #1,000.

Craig and Marcus over time

Craig and Marcus appear together in 4 published lists, across 117 years of shared records. Neither was ahead in more lists than the other.

The order between them changed and held in 2 of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Craig reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 3 of those lists, Marcus in 1. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

How this pair is related

The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.

List by list

  • Republic of Ireland · Boys59 shared years, 1964–2023

    Craig held the stronger position in 30 of those years, Marcus in 29.

    Highest recorded here: Craig #39 in 1990, Marcus #99 in 1972.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2023: Craig #516, Marcus #172.

  • England and Wales · Boys30 shared years, 1996–2025

    Craig held the stronger position in 1 of those years, Marcus in 29.

    Highest recorded here: Craig #81 in 1996, Marcus #83 in 2001.

    The order changed in 1997: Marcus moved ahead. In 1996 they stood at #81 and #85; by 1997 that had become #91 and #88.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Craig #1705, Marcus #267.

  • Northern Ireland · Boys17 shared years, 1997–2015

    Craig held the stronger position in 7 of those years, Marcus in 10.

    Highest recorded here: Craig #68 in 1997, Marcus #100 in 2003.

    The order changed in 2004: Marcus moved ahead. In 2003 they stood at #89 and #100; by 2004 that had become #121 and #108.

    Most recent shared year, 2015: Craig #415, Marcus #156.

  • New Zealand · Boys11 shared years, 1971–1991

    Craig held the stronger position in 11 of those years, Marcus in 0.

    Highest recorded here: Craig #6 in 1971, Marcus #81 in 1985.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 1991: Craig #62, Marcus #96.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Where to go next

Comparisons that share a name, a rule or a published list with this one. Each is an existing comparison page with its own evidence — nothing here says these pairs are alike.

Other comparisons involving Craig

Pairs where Craig shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Other comparisons involving Marcus

Pairs where Marcus shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Other pairs with the same kind of relationship

Pairs that qualify under the same rule as this one — started together, ended far apart.

All started together, ended far apart →

Other pairs from England and Wales lists

Pairs measured inside England and Wales's own published lists, where this pair's strongest relationship is also recorded. Positions in these lists are not comparable with another registrar's.

England and Wales overview →

Other pairs ranked together in the 2020s

Pairs both ranked in the same published list at some point between 2020 and 2029.

The 2020s across all registrars →

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Craig, Marcus
FieldCraigMarcus
Record typeEditorially researched profileOfficial statistical record (evidence-only)
Gender usagemalemale
MeaningFrom the Scottish surname derived from Gaelic 'creag', meaning 'crag, rocks, outcrop' — originally denoting someone who lived near a crag.Not yet recorded
OriginScottish Gaelic (surname origin)Not yet recorded
Pronunciation/ˈkɹeɪɡ/
Syllables12
Common variants / nicknamesNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Recorded regional usageNew South Wales, Australia, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Republic of Ireland, New ZealandNew South Wales, Australia, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Republic of Ireland, Norway, New Zealand
Most recent popularity observationEngland and Wales · Boys #1705 (2025)Norway · Boys #150 (2025)
Data Confidencemediummedium

What the data shows

  • Craig has a recorded origin (Scottish Gaelic (surname origin)); Marcus does not have one recorded yet.
  • Craig has 1 syllable, compared with 2 for Marcus.
  • A meaning is recorded for Craig; Marcus doesn't have one written yet.
  • Both names have recorded usage in AU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NZ.

How each name got here

Craig

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1953

    First recorded at #79 among boys in New South Wales, Australia in 1953 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    New South Wales, Australia · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1954–1992

    Highest recorded position: #6 among boys in New Zealand, in 1971 (recorded 1954–1992).

    New Zealand · Boys

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #1705 among boys in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Boys

Marcus

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1963

    First recorded at #399 among boys in Norway in 1963 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1963–2025

    Highest recorded position: #24 among boys in Norway, in 2001 (recorded 1963–2025).

    Norway · Boys

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #267 among boys in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Boys