Namewise

Emily vs Kayla

Emily and Kayla compared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Girls

    In 2012, Emily was ranked #3 and Kayla #83 among girls in New South Wales, Australia.

  • New Zealand · Girls

    In 2014, Emily was ranked #4 and Kayla #89 among girls in New Zealand.

  • Northern Ireland · Girls

    In 2024, Emily was ranked #5 and Kayla #253 among girls in Northern Ireland.

  • Republic of Ireland · Girls

    In 2025, Emily was ranked #6 and Kayla #130 among girls in Republic of Ireland.

  • Scotland · Girls

    In 2024, Emily was ranked #7 and Kayla #171 among girls in Scotland.

  • England and Wales · Girls

    In 2025, Emily was ranked #44 and Kayla #386 among girls in England and Wales.

Emily and Kayla over time

Republic of Ireland · Girls
#1#3#10#30#100#30019912025Emily #6Kayla #1301991: Emily #65, Kayla #5151992: Emily #51, Kayla #4561993: Emily #43, Kayla #4481996: Emily #31, Kayla #2951997: Emily #27, Kayla #3631998: Emily #25, Kayla #2701999: Emily #14, Kayla #2272000: Emily #19, Kayla #1792001: Emily #18, Kayla #1802002: Emily #19, Kayla #1122003: Emily #20, Kayla #1032004: Emily #13, Kayla #882005: Emily #11, Kayla #672006: Emily #11, Kayla #592007: Emily #8, Kayla #532008: Emily #5, Kayla #482009: Emily #7, Kayla #432010: Emily #2, Kayla #412011: Emily #1, Kayla #212012: Emily #1, Kayla #332013: Emily #1, Kayla #452014: Emily #1, Kayla #462015: Emily #1, Kayla #682016: Emily #1, Kayla #702017: Emily #1, Kayla #702018: Emily #1, Kayla #792019: Emily #1, Kayla #892020: Emily #3, Kayla #1032021: Emily #3, Kayla #1032022: Emily #1, Kayla #1052023: Emily #3, Kayla #1112024: Emily #4, Kayla #1092025: Emily #6, Kayla #130

Higher on the chart is a stronger position. The scale is logarithmic, so the gap from #1 to #10 is drawn as large as the gap from #100 to #1,000.

England and Wales · Girls
#1#3#10#30#100#30019962025Emily #44Kayla #3861996: Emily #4, Kayla #5261997: Emily #2, Kayla #4491998: Emily #2, Kayla #4761999: Emily #2, Kayla #4062000: Emily #2, Kayla #3002001: Emily #2, Kayla #2652002: Emily #2, Kayla #2592003: Emily #1, Kayla #2222004: Emily #1, Kayla #2162005: Emily #2, Kayla #1782006: Emily #5, Kayla #1392007: Emily #4, Kayla #1542008: Emily #3, Kayla #1412009: Emily #4, Kayla #1272010: Emily #3, Kayla #1192011: Emily #5, Kayla #982012: Emily #4, Kayla #1352013: Emily #3, Kayla #1692014: Emily #4, Kayla #1892015: Emily #3, Kayla #2432016: Emily #3, Kayla #2632017: Emily #5, Kayla #2842018: Emily #5, Kayla #3232019: Emily #11, Kayla #3292020: Emily #15, Kayla #2962021: Emily #19, Kayla #3652022: Emily #19, Kayla #3822023: Emily #28, Kayla #3532024: Emily #34, Kayla #3322025: Emily #44, Kayla #386

Higher on the chart is a stronger position. The scale is logarithmic, so the gap from #1 to #10 is drawn as large as the gap from #100 to #1,000.

Emily and Kayla over time

Emily and Kayla appear together in 5 published lists, across 146 years of shared records. Emily held the stronger position in more years in 5 of them, Kayla in 0.

The order between them changed and held in one of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Kayla reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 3 of those lists, Emily in 1. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

How this pair is related

The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.

  • One moved ahead of the other

    In 1992, Emily moved ahead of Kayla in New Zealand · Girls — #28 and #20 the year before became #12 and #18.

  • Closest over the longest run

    Across 27 shared years in New South Wales, Australia · Girls, Emily and Kayla averaged 46.3 places apart, ending at #3 and #83.

  • Mirrored each other

    Over 29 shared years in New Zealand · Girls, Emily rose about as far as Kayla fell — from #40 and #38 in 1986 to #4 and #89 in 2014.

  • Longest-running competitions

    Emily and Kayla were both ranked in England and Wales · Girls for 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, ending at #44 and #386.

  • Peaked in the same years

    Both reached their highest recorded position in Northern Ireland · Girls within 2 years — Emily #1 in 2013, Kayla #40 in 2011.

List by list

  • Republic of Ireland · Girls33 shared years, 1991–2025

    Emily held the stronger position in 33 of those years, Kayla in 0.

    Highest recorded here: Emily #1 in 2011, Kayla #21 in 2011.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Emily #6, Kayla #130.

  • England and Wales · Girls30 shared years, 1996–2025

    Emily held the stronger position in 30 of those years, Kayla in 0.

    Highest recorded here: Emily #1 in 2003, Kayla #98 in 2011.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Emily #44, Kayla #386.

  • New Zealand · Girls29 shared years, 1986–2014

    Emily held the stronger position in 27 of those years, Kayla in 2.

    Highest recorded here: Emily #2 in 2013, Kayla #18 in 1992.

    The order changed in 1992: Emily moved ahead. In 1991 they stood at #28 and #20; by 1992 that had become #12 and #18.

    Most recent shared year, 2014: Emily #4, Kayla #89.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Girls27 shared years, 1985–2012

    Emily held the stronger position in 27 of those years, Kayla in 0.

    Highest recorded here: Emily #1 in 1998, Kayla #28 in 1990.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2012: Emily #3, Kayla #83.

  • Northern Ireland · Girls27 shared years, 1998–2024

    Emily held the stronger position in 27 of those years, Kayla in 0.

    Highest recorded here: Emily #1 in 2013, Kayla #40 in 2011.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2024: Emily #5, Kayla #253.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Where to go next

Comparisons that share a name, a rule or a published list with this one. Each is an existing comparison page with its own evidence — nothing here says these pairs are alike.

Other comparisons involving Emily

Pairs where Emily shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Other comparisons involving Kayla

Pairs where Kayla shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Other pairs with the same kind of relationship

Pairs that qualify under the same rule as this one — peaked in the same years.

All peaked in the same years →

Other pairs from Northern Ireland lists

Pairs measured inside Northern Ireland's own published lists, where this pair's strongest relationship is also recorded. Positions in these lists are not comparable with another registrar's.

Northern Ireland overview →

Other pairs ranked together in the 2020s

Pairs both ranked in the same published list at some point between 2020 and 2029.

The 2020s across all registrars →

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Emily, Kayla
FieldEmilyKayla
Record typeEditorially researched profileOfficial statistical record (evidence-only)
Gender usagefemalefemale
MeaningRival, striving, eager (traditional interpretation of the Latin root).Not yet recorded
OriginLatin, from the Roman family name AemiliaNot yet recorded
Pronunciation/ˈɛməli/Not yet recorded
Syllables32
Common variants / nicknamesEm, Emmy, Emilie, Amelia, AemiliaNot yet recorded
Recorded regional usageNew South Wales, Australia, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Republic of Ireland, Norway, New ZealandNew South Wales, Australia, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Republic of Ireland, New Zealand
Most recent popularity observationRepublic of Ireland · Girls #6 (2025)Republic of Ireland · Girls #130 (2025)
Data Confidencehighmedium

What the data shows

  • Emily has a recorded origin (Latin, from the Roman family name Aemilia); Kayla does not have one recorded yet.
  • Emily has 3 syllables, compared with 2 for Kayla.
  • A meaning is recorded for Emily; Kayla doesn't have one written yet.
  • Both names have recorded usage in AU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NZ.
  • The available evidence gives Emily a "high" Data Confidence level and Kayla a "medium" level — this reflects how complete and corroborated the underlying evidence is, not a judgement of either name.

How each name got here

Emily

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1964

    First recorded at #180 among girls in Republic of Ireland in 1964 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Republic of Ireland · Girls

  2. Highest recorded1996–2025

    Highest recorded position: #1 among girls in England and Wales, in 2003 (recorded 1996–2025).

    England and Wales · Girls

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #44 among girls in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Girls

Kayla

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1985

    First recorded at #68 among girls in New South Wales, Australia in 1985 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    New South Wales, Australia · Girls

  2. Highest recorded1986–2014

    Highest recorded position: #18 among girls in New Zealand, in 1992 (recorded 1986–2014).

    New Zealand · Girls

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #386 among girls in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Girls