Namewise

Jacob vs Philip

Jacob and Philipcompared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • Northern Ireland · Boys

    In 2022, Jacob was ranked #19 and Philip #311 among boys in Northern Ireland.

  • Scotland · Boys

    In 2024, Jacob was ranked #27 and Philip #619 among boys in Scotland.

  • England and Wales · Boys

    In 2024, Jacob was ranked #30 and Philip #461 among boys in England and Wales.

  • New Zealand · Boys

    In 1992, Jacob was ranked #31 and Philip #95 among boys in New Zealand.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Boys

    In 1988, Jacob was ranked #44 and Philip #98 among boys in New South Wales, Australia.

  • Norway · Boys

    In 2025, Jacob was ranked #59 and Philip #91 among boys in Norway.

  • Republic of Ireland · Boys

    In 2025, Jacob was ranked #62 and Philip #309 among boys in Republic of Ireland.

Jacob and Philip over time

Jacob and Philip appear together in 5 published lists, across 177 years of shared records. Jacob held the stronger position in more years in 4 of them, Philip in 0.

The order between them changed and held in 3 of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Philip reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 5 of those lists, and Jacob in none. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

How this pair is related

The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.

List by list

  • Norway · Boys69 shared years, 19482025

    Jacob held the stronger position in 49 of those years, Philip in 20.

    Highest recorded here: Jacob #34 in 2017, Philip #68 in 2013.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Jacob #59, Philip #91.

  • Republic of Ireland · Boys40 shared years, 19802025

    Jacob held the stronger position in 20 of those years, Philip in 20.

    Highest recorded here: Jacob #37 in 2016, Philip #36 in 1980.

    The order changed in 2007: Jacob moved ahead. In 2006 they stood at #113 and #101; by 2007 that had become #94 and #129.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Jacob #62, Philip #309.

  • England and Wales · Boys29 shared years, 19962024

    Jacob held the stronger position in 29 of those years, Philip in 0.

    Highest recorded here: Jacob #4 in 2013, Philip #103 in 1996.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2024: Jacob #30, Philip #461.

  • Northern Ireland · Boys26 shared years, 19972022

    Jacob held the stronger position in 22 of those years, Philip in 4.

    Highest recorded here: Jacob #5 in 2017, Philip #51 in 1997.

    The order changed in 2002: Jacob moved ahead. In 2001 they stood at #91 and #80; by 2002 that had become #86 and #96.

    Most recent shared year, 2022: Jacob #19, Philip #311.

  • New Zealand · Boys13 shared years, 19771992

    Jacob held the stronger position in 7 of those years, Philip in 6.

    Highest recorded here: Jacob #31 in 1992, Philip #44 in 1980.

    The order changed in 1985: Jacob moved ahead. In 1984 they stood at #63 and #55; by 1985 that had become #55 and #60.

    Most recent shared year, 1992: Jacob #31, Philip #95.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Jacob, Philip
FieldJacobPhilip
Record typeEditorially researched profileOfficial statistical record (evidence-only)
Gender usagemalemale
MeaningCommonly interpreted as 'holder of the heel' or 'supplanter', referencing the biblical account of Jacob being born grasping his twin brother Esau's heel. A less common alternate theory holds it may derive from a longer form meaning roughly 'may God protect'.Not yet recorded
OriginBiblical Hebrew, via Greek and LatinNot yet recorded
Pronunciation/ˈdʒeɪkəb/Not yet recorded
Syllables22
Common variants / nicknamesNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Recorded regional usageAU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZAU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZ
Most recent popularity observationNew South Wales, Australia · Boys #42 (2025)Norway · Boys #91 (2025)
Pronunciation clarity (demonstration score)90/100Not yet recorded
Spelling simplicity (demonstration score)94/10088/100
International familiarity (demonstration score)100/100100/100
Data Confidencemediummedium

What the data shows

  • Jacob has a recorded origin (Biblical Hebrew, via Greek and Latin); Philip does not have one recorded yet.
  • Jacob and Philip both have 2 syllables.
  • A meaning is recorded for Jacob; Philip doesn't have one written yet.
  • Both names have recorded usage in AU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZ.

How each name got here

Jacob

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1945

    First recorded at #273 among boys in Norway in 1945 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1996–2024

    Highest recorded position: #4 among boys in England and Wales, in 2013 (recorded 1996–2024).

    England and Wales · Boys

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #42 among boys in New South Wales, Australia, in 2025.

    New South Wales, Australia · Boys

Philip

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1948

    First recorded at #341 among boys in Norway in 1948 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1954–1992

    Highest recorded position: #20 among boys in New Zealand, in 1963 (recorded 1954–1992).

    New Zealand · Boys

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #91 among boys in Norway, in 2025.

    Norway · Boys