Namewise

Jacob vs Philip

Jacob and Philip compared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • Northern Ireland · Boys

    In 2022, Jacob was ranked #19 and Philip #311 among boys in Northern Ireland.

  • Scotland · Boys

    In 2024, Jacob was ranked #27 and Philip #619 among boys in Scotland.

  • New Zealand · Boys

    In 1992, Jacob was ranked #31 and Philip #95 among boys in New Zealand.

  • England and Wales · Boys

    In 2025, Jacob was ranked #41 and Philip #549 among boys in England and Wales.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Boys

    In 1988, Jacob was ranked #44 and Philip #98 among boys in New South Wales, Australia.

  • Norway · Boys

    In 2025, Jacob was ranked #59 and Philip #91 among boys in Norway.

  • Republic of Ireland · Boys

    In 2025, Jacob was ranked #62 and Philip #309 among boys in Republic of Ireland.

Jacob and Philip over time

Norway · Boys
#100#30019482025Jacob #59Philip #911948: Jacob #209, Philip #3411949: Jacob #223, Philip #3591953: Jacob #263, Philip #3461954: Jacob #266, Philip #3911957: Jacob #273, Philip #4421958: Jacob #355, Philip #3401961: Jacob #395, Philip #4921962: Jacob #384, Philip #4661963: Jacob #392, Philip #4941965: Jacob #382, Philip #3871966: Jacob #265, Philip #3671967: Jacob #259, Philip #3271969: Jacob #299, Philip #4551970: Jacob #302, Philip #5061971: Jacob #291, Philip #4251972: Jacob #261, Philip #3541973: Jacob #301, Philip #3951974: Jacob #257, Philip #3381975: Jacob #284, Philip #5021976: Jacob #255, Philip #3081977: Jacob #448, Philip #3451978: Jacob #316, Philip #4591979: Jacob #306, Philip #2971980: Jacob #340, Philip #2901981: Jacob #466, Philip #3181982: Jacob #287, Philip #2461983: Jacob #334, Philip #2471984: Jacob #348, Philip #2371985: Jacob #244, Philip #2361986: Jacob #265, Philip #3001987: Jacob #249, Philip #1711988: Jacob #250, Philip #1941989: Jacob #218, Philip #1931990: Jacob #200, Philip #1561991: Jacob #227, Philip #1731992: Jacob #219, Philip #1801993: Jacob #147, Philip #1581994: Jacob #140, Philip #1381995: Jacob #140, Philip #1761996: Jacob #124, Philip #1191997: Jacob #114, Philip #1161998: Jacob #91, Philip #1101999: Jacob #100, Philip #1012000: Jacob #96, Philip #982001: Jacob #76, Philip #862002: Jacob #65, Philip #782003: Jacob #68, Philip #802004: Jacob #69, Philip #712005: Jacob #81, Philip #742006: Jacob #84, Philip #792007: Jacob #75, Philip #692008: Jacob #72, Philip #862009: Jacob #66, Philip #772010: Jacob #62, Philip #772011: Jacob #74, Philip #842012: Jacob #55, Philip #912013: Jacob #60, Philip #682014: Jacob #59, Philip #882015: Jacob #50, Philip #742016: Jacob #67, Philip #782017: Jacob #34, Philip #772018: Jacob #53, Philip #692019: Jacob #47, Philip #832020: Jacob #44, Philip #942021: Jacob #60, Philip #892022: Jacob #51, Philip #892023: Jacob #60, Philip #892024: Jacob #56, Philip #1032025: Jacob #59, Philip #91

Higher on the chart is a stronger position. The scale is logarithmic, so the gap from #1 to #10 is drawn as large as the gap from #100 to #1,000.

Republic of Ireland · Boys
#100#30019802025Jacob #62Philip #3091980: Jacob #321, Philip #361981: Jacob #322, Philip #381987: Jacob #303, Philip #381989: Jacob #307, Philip #361990: Jacob #286, Philip #421991: Jacob #230, Philip #421992: Jacob #251, Philip #491993: Jacob #190, Philip #501994: Jacob #167, Philip #521995: Jacob #198, Philip #521996: Jacob #192, Philip #641997: Jacob #184, Philip #681998: Jacob #158, Philip #871999: Jacob #161, Philip #782000: Jacob #116, Philip #742001: Jacob #120, Philip #972002: Jacob #123, Philip #1192003: Jacob #115, Philip #1122004: Jacob #134, Philip #1252005: Jacob #109, Philip #1292006: Jacob #113, Philip #1012007: Jacob #94, Philip #1292008: Jacob #110, Philip #1262009: Jacob #111, Philip #1402010: Jacob #75, Philip #1522011: Jacob #64, Philip #1872012: Jacob #64, Philip #1412013: Jacob #53, Philip #1472014: Jacob #49, Philip #1472015: Jacob #49, Philip #1612016: Jacob #37, Philip #1592017: Jacob #41, Philip #1622018: Jacob #41, Philip #1872019: Jacob #38, Philip #2142020: Jacob #37, Philip #1932021: Jacob #49, Philip #2152022: Jacob #48, Philip #2512023: Jacob #60, Philip #3032024: Jacob #64, Philip #3272025: Jacob #62, Philip #309

Higher on the chart is a stronger position. The scale is logarithmic, so the gap from #1 to #10 is drawn as large as the gap from #100 to #1,000.

Jacob and Philip over time

Jacob and Philip appear together in 5 published lists, across 178 years of shared records. Jacob held the stronger position in more years in 4 of them, Philip in 0.

The order between them changed and held in 3 of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Philip reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 5 of those lists, and Jacob in none. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

How this pair is related

The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.

List by list

  • Norway · Boys69 shared years, 1948–2025

    Jacob held the stronger position in 49 of those years, Philip in 20.

    Highest recorded here: Jacob #34 in 2017, Philip #68 in 2013.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Jacob #59, Philip #91.

  • Republic of Ireland · Boys40 shared years, 1980–2025

    Jacob held the stronger position in 20 of those years, Philip in 20.

    Highest recorded here: Jacob #37 in 2016, Philip #36 in 1980.

    The order changed in 2007: Jacob moved ahead. In 2006 they stood at #113 and #101; by 2007 that had become #94 and #129.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Jacob #62, Philip #309.

  • England and Wales · Boys30 shared years, 1996–2025

    Jacob held the stronger position in 30 of those years, Philip in 0.

    Highest recorded here: Jacob #4 in 2013, Philip #103 in 1996.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Jacob #41, Philip #549.

  • Northern Ireland · Boys26 shared years, 1997–2022

    Jacob held the stronger position in 22 of those years, Philip in 4.

    Highest recorded here: Jacob #5 in 2017, Philip #51 in 1997.

    The order changed in 2002: Jacob moved ahead. In 2001 they stood at #91 and #80; by 2002 that had become #86 and #96.

    Most recent shared year, 2022: Jacob #19, Philip #311.

  • New Zealand · Boys13 shared years, 1977–1992

    Jacob held the stronger position in 7 of those years, Philip in 6.

    Highest recorded here: Jacob #31 in 1992, Philip #44 in 1980.

    The order changed in 1985: Jacob moved ahead. In 1984 they stood at #63 and #55; by 1985 that had become #55 and #60.

    Most recent shared year, 1992: Jacob #31, Philip #95.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Where to go next

Comparisons that share a name, a rule or a published list with this one. Each is an existing comparison page with its own evidence — nothing here says these pairs are alike.

Other comparisons involving Jacob

Pairs where Jacob shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Other comparisons involving Philip

Pairs where Philip shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Other pairs with the same kind of relationship

Pairs that qualify under the same rule as this one — repeatedly exchanged positions.

All repeatedly exchanged positions →

Other pairs from Norway lists

Pairs measured inside Norway's own published lists, where this pair's strongest relationship is also recorded. Positions in these lists are not comparable with another registrar's.

Norway overview →

Other pairs ranked together in the 2020s

Pairs both ranked in the same published list at some point between 2020 and 2029.

The 2020s across all registrars →

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Jacob, Philip
FieldJacobPhilip
Record typeEditorially researched profileOfficial statistical record (evidence-only)
Gender usagemalemale
MeaningCommonly interpreted as 'holder of the heel' or 'supplanter', referencing the biblical account of Jacob being born grasping his twin brother Esau's heel. A less common alternate theory holds it may derive from a longer form meaning roughly 'may God protect'.Not yet recorded
OriginBiblical Hebrew, via Greek and LatinNot yet recorded
Pronunciation/ˈdʒeɪkəb/Not yet recorded
Syllables22
Common variants / nicknamesNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Recorded regional usageNew South Wales, Australia, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Republic of Ireland, Norway, New ZealandNew South Wales, Australia, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Republic of Ireland, Norway, New Zealand
Most recent popularity observationEngland and Wales · Boys #41 (2025)Norway · Boys #91 (2025)
Data Confidencemediummedium

What the data shows

  • Jacob has a recorded origin (Biblical Hebrew, via Greek and Latin); Philip does not have one recorded yet.
  • Jacob and Philip both have 2 syllables.
  • A meaning is recorded for Jacob; Philip doesn't have one written yet.
  • Both names have recorded usage in AU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZ.

How each name got here

Jacob

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1945

    First recorded at #273 among boys in Norway in 1945 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1996–2025

    Highest recorded position: #4 among boys in England and Wales, in 2013 (recorded 1996–2025).

    England and Wales · Boys

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #41 among boys in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Boys

Philip

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1948

    First recorded at #341 among boys in Norway in 1948 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1954–1992

    Highest recorded position: #20 among boys in New Zealand, in 1963 (recorded 1954–1992).

    New Zealand · Boys

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #549 among boys in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Boys