Namewise

Jo vs Kim

Jo and Kimcompared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • Norway · Boys

    In 2023, Jo was ranked #277 and Kim #370 among boys in Norway.

  • Republic of Ireland · Girls

    In 2018, Jo was ranked #896 and Kim #896 among girls in Republic of Ireland.

  • England and Wales · Boys

    In 2009, Jo was ranked #2318 and Kim #2544 among boys in England and Wales.

  • England and Wales · Girls

    In 2013, Jo was ranked #5742 and Kim #3160 among girls in England and Wales.

Jo and Kim over time

Jo and Kim appear together in 4 published lists, across 115 years of shared records. Kim held the stronger position in more years in 4 of them, Jo in 0.

The order between them changed and held in one of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Jo reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 2 of those lists, Kim in 1. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

How this pair is related

The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.

  • Repeatedly exchanged positions

    Jo and Kim changed places 5 times in England and Wales · Boys between 1996 and 2009, ending at #2318 and #2544.

  • Longest-running competitions

    Jo and Kim were both ranked in Norway · Boys for 70 years, from 1951 to 2023, ending at #277 and #370.

  • Peaked in the same years

    Both reached their highest recorded position in England and Wales · Girls within 2 years — Jo #736 in 1996, Kim #382 in 1996.

List by list

  • Norway · Boys70 shared years, 19512023

    Jo held the stronger position in 24 of those years, Kim in 46.

    Highest recorded here: Jo #96 in 1966, Kim #10 in 1987.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2023: Jo #277, Kim #370.

  • England and Wales · Girls17 shared years, 19962013

    Jo held the stronger position in 0 of those years, Kim in 17.

    Highest recorded here: Jo #736 in 1996, Kim #382 in 1996.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2013: Jo #5742, Kim #3160.

  • Republic of Ireland · Girls17 shared years, 19712018

    Jo held the stronger position in 0 of those years, Kim in 16.

    Highest recorded here: Jo #349 in 1973, Kim #70 in 1989.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2018: Jo #896, Kim #896.

  • England and Wales · Boys11 shared years, 19962009

    Jo held the stronger position in 4 of those years, Kim in 6.

    Highest recorded here: Jo #1703 in 2000, Kim #1168 in 1996.

    The order changed in 2009: Jo moved ahead. In 2008 they stood at #3687 and #3687; by 2009 that had become #2318 and #2544.

    Most recent shared year, 2009: Jo #2318, Kim #2544.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Where to go next

Comparisons that share a name, a rule or a published list with this one. Each is an existing comparison page with its own evidence — nothing here says these pairs are alike.

Other comparisons involving Kim

Pairs where Kim shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Jo, Kim
FieldJoKim
Record typeOfficial statistical record (evidence-only)Official statistical record (evidence-only)
Gender usageUsed for both boys and girlsUsed for both boys and girls
MeaningNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
OriginNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
PronunciationNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Syllables11
Common variants / nicknamesNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Recorded regional usageGB-ENW, IE, NOAU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, IE, NO, NZ
Most recent popularity observationNorway · Boys #319 (2025)Republic of Ireland · Girls #736 (2024)
Pronunciation clarity (demonstration score)Not yet recordedNot yet recorded
Spelling simplicity (demonstration score)95/10095/100
International familiarity (demonstration score)100/100100/100
Data Confidencemediummedium

What the data shows

  • Jo and Kim both have 1 syllable.
  • Both names have recorded usage in GB-ENW, IE, NO.

How each name got here

Jo

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1945

    First recorded at #301 among boys in Norway in 1945 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1945–2025

    Highest recorded position: #96 among boys in Norway, in 1966 (recorded 1945–2025).

    Norway · Boys

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #319 among boys in Norway, in 2025.

    Norway · Boys

Kim

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1951

    First recorded at #344 among girls in Norway in 1951 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Girls

  2. Highest recorded1958–1985

    Highest recorded position: #5 among girls in New Zealand, in 1968 (recorded 1958–1985).

    New Zealand · Girls

  3. Most recent2024

    Most recently recorded at #4192 among girls in England and Wales, in 2024.

    England and Wales · Girls