Namewise

Kim vs Lisa

Kim and Lisacompared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Girls

    In 1984, Kim was ranked #80 and Lisa #9 among girls in New South Wales, Australia.

  • New Zealand · Girls

    In 1985, Kim was ranked #78 and Lisa #9 among girls in New Zealand.

  • Norway · Girls

    In 2011, Kim was ranked #589 and Lisa #71 among girls in Norway.

  • Northern Ireland · Girls

    In 2008, Kim was ranked #439 and Lisa #228 among girls in Northern Ireland.

  • Republic of Ireland · Girls

    In 2024, Kim was ranked #736 and Lisa #320 among girls in Republic of Ireland.

  • England and Wales · Girls

    In 2025, Kim was ranked #3333 and Lisa #661 among girls in England and Wales.

Kim and Lisa over time

Kim and Lisa appear together in 5 published lists, across 191 years of shared records. Lisa held the stronger position in more years in 5 of them, Kim in 0.

The order between them changed and held in 3 of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Kim reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 2 of those lists, Lisa in 1. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

How this pair is related

The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.

  • One moved ahead of the other

    In 1963, Lisa moved ahead of Kim in New South Wales, Australia · Girls — #11 and #25 the year before became #15 and #14.

  • Repeatedly exchanged positions

    Kim and Lisa changed places 4 times in Norway · Girls between 1951 and 2011, ending at #589 and #71.

  • Closest over the longest run

    Across 26 shared years in New South Wales, Australia · Girls, Kim and Lisa averaged 21.4 places apart, ending at #80 and #9.

  • Mirrored each other

    Over 54 shared years in Norway · Girls, Lisa rose about as far as Kim fell — from #344 and #250 in 1951 to #589 and #71 in 2011.

  • Longest-running competitions

    Kim and Lisa were both ranked in England and Wales · Girls for 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, ending at #3333 and #661.

  • Peaked in the same years

    Both reached their highest recorded position in England and Wales · Girls within 2 years — Kim #382 in 1996, Lisa #105 in 1996.

List by list

  • Republic of Ireland · Girls57 shared years, 1964–2024

    Kim held the stronger position in 1 of those years, Lisa in 56.

    Highest recorded here: Kim #64 in 1992, Lisa #3 in 1984.

    The order changed in 1965: Lisa moved ahead. In 1964 they stood at #206 and #222; by 1965 that had become #221 and #209.

    Most recent shared year, 2024: Kim #736, Lisa #320.

  • Norway · Girls54 shared years, 1951–2011

    Kim held the stronger position in 2 of those years, Lisa in 52.

    Highest recorded here: Kim #205 in 1967, Lisa #37 in 1994.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2011: Kim #589, Lisa #71.

  • England and Wales · Girls30 shared years, 1996–2025

    Kim held the stronger position in 0 of those years, Lisa in 30.

    Highest recorded here: Kim #382 in 1996, Lisa #105 in 1996.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Kim #3333, Lisa #661.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Girls26 shared years, 1959–1984

    Kim held the stronger position in 4 of those years, Lisa in 22.

    Highest recorded here: Kim #6 in 1959, Lisa #2 in 1968.

    The order changed in 1963: Lisa moved ahead. In 1962 they stood at #11 and #25; by 1963 that had become #15 and #14.

    Most recent shared year, 1984: Kim #80, Lisa #9.

  • New Zealand · Girls24 shared years, 1962–1985

    Kim held the stronger position in 4 of those years, Lisa in 20.

    Highest recorded here: Kim #5 in 1968, Lisa #1 in 1968.

    The order changed in 1966: Lisa moved ahead. In 1965 they stood at #20 and #31; by 1966 that had become #23 and #7.

    Most recent shared year, 1985: Kim #78, Lisa #9.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Where to go next

Comparisons that share a name, a rule or a published list with this one. Each is an existing comparison page with its own evidence — nothing here says these pairs are alike.

Other comparisons involving Kim

Pairs where Kim shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Other comparisons involving Lisa

Pairs where Lisa shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Other pairs with the same kind of relationship

Pairs that qualify under the same rule as this one — one moved ahead of the other.

All one moved ahead of the other→

Other pairs from New Zealand lists

Pairs measured inside New Zealand's own published lists, where this pair's strongest relationship is also recorded. Positions in these lists are not comparable with another registrar's.

New Zealand overview→

Other pairs ranked together in the 1980s

Pairs both ranked in the same published list at some point between 1980 and 1989.

The 1980s across all registrars→

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Kim, Lisa
FieldKimLisa
Record typeOfficial statistical record (evidence-only)Editorially researched profile
Gender usageUsed for both boys and girlsfemale
MeaningNot yet recordedA short form of Elizabeth, often used independently — notably the name of the subject of Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa.
OriginNot yet recordedHebrew, short form of Elizabeth
PronunciationNot yet recorded/ˈliː.sə/
Syllables12
Common variants / nicknamesNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Recorded regional usageAU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, IE, NO, NZAU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZ
Most recent popularity observationEngland and Wales · Girls #3333 (2025)Norway · Girls #174 (2025)
Pronunciation clarity (demonstration score)Not yet recorded90/100
Spelling simplicity (demonstration score)95/10095/100
International familiarity (demonstration score)100/100100/100
Data Confidencemediummedium

What the data shows

  • Lisa has a recorded origin (Hebrew, short form of Elizabeth); Kim does not have one recorded yet.
  • Kim has 1 syllable, compared with 2 for Lisa.
  • A meaning is recorded for Lisa; Kim doesn't have one written yet.
  • Both names have recorded usage in AU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, IE, NO, NZ.

How each name got here

Kim

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1951

    First recorded at #344 among girls in Norway in 1951 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Girls

  2. Highest recorded1958–1985

    Highest recorded position: #5 among girls in New Zealand, in 1968 (recorded 1958–1985).

    New Zealand · Girls

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #3333 among girls in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Girls

Lisa

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1945

    First recorded at #330 among girls in Norway in 1945 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Girls

  2. Highest recorded1962–1997

    Highest recorded position: #1 among girls in New Zealand, in 1968 (recorded 1962–1997).

    New Zealand · Girls

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #661 among girls in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Girls