Namewise

Kim vs Mansoor

Kim and Mansoorcompared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • England and Wales · Boys

    In 2015, Kim was ranked #4747 and Mansoor #3908 among boys in England and Wales.

Kim and Mansoor over time

Kim and Mansoor appear together in 1 published list, across 17 years of shared records. Kim held the stronger position in more years in 1 of them, Mansoor in 0.

The order between them changed and held in one of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

How this pair is related

The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.

  • Repeatedly exchanged positions

    Kim and Mansoor changed places 5 times in England and Wales · Boys between 1996 and 2015, ending at #4747 and #3908.

  • Peaked in the same years

    Both reached their highest recorded position in England and Wales · Boys within 2 years — Kim #1168 in 1996, Mansoor #1765 in 1996.

List by list

  • England and Wales · Boys17 shared years, 19962015

    Kim held the stronger position in 9 of those years, Mansoor in 6.

    Highest recorded here: Kim #1168 in 1996, Mansoor #1765 in 1996.

    The order changed in 2008: Mansoor moved ahead. In 2007 they stood at #2435 and #2741; by 2008 that had become #3687 and #3687.

    Most recent shared year, 2015: Kim #4747, Mansoor #3908.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Where to go next

Comparisons that share a name, a rule or a published list with this one. Each is an existing comparison page with its own evidence — nothing here says these pairs are alike.

Other comparisons involving Kim

Pairs where Kim shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Kim, Mansoor
FieldKimMansoor
Record typeOfficial statistical record (evidence-only)Official statistical record (evidence-only)
Gender usageUsed for both boys and girlsmale
MeaningNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
OriginNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
PronunciationNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Syllables12
Common variants / nicknamesNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Recorded regional usageAU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, IE, NO, NZGB-ENW
Most recent popularity observationEngland and Wales · Girls #3333 (2025)England and Wales · Boys #2952 (2025)
Pronunciation clarity (demonstration score)Not yet recordedNot yet recorded
Spelling simplicity (demonstration score)95/10082/100
International familiarity (demonstration score)100/10040/100
Data Confidencemediummedium

What the data shows

  • Kim has 1 syllable, compared with 2 for Mansoor.
  • Both names have recorded usage in GB-ENW.

How each name got here

Kim

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1951

    First recorded at #344 among girls in Norway in 1951 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Girls

  2. Highest recorded1958–1985

    Highest recorded position: #5 among girls in New Zealand, in 1968 (recorded 1958–1985).

    New Zealand · Girls

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #3333 among girls in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Girls

Mansoor

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1996

    First recorded at #1765 among boys in England and Wales in 1996 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    England and Wales · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1996–2025

    Highest recorded position: #1765 among boys in England and Wales, in 1996 (recorded 1996–2025).

    England and Wales · Boys

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #2952 among boys in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Boys