Namewise

Mark vs Matthew

Mark and Matthewcompared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • New Zealand · Boys

    In 2000, Mark was ranked #89 and Matthew #5 among boys in New Zealand.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Boys

    In 2001, Mark was ranked #90 and Matthew #7 among boys in New South Wales, Australia.

  • Northern Ireland · Boys

    In 2024, Mark was ranked #177 and Matthew #42 among boys in Northern Ireland.

  • Republic of Ireland · Boys

    In 2025, Mark was ranked #99 and Matthew #55 among boys in Republic of Ireland.

  • Scotland · Boys

    In 2024, Mark was ranked #169 and Matthew #73 among boys in Scotland.

  • England and Wales · Boys

    In 2024, Mark was ranked #277 and Matthew #149 among boys in England and Wales.

  • Norway · Boys

    In 2023, Mark was ranked #371 and Matthew #421 among boys in Norway.

Mark and Matthew over time

Mark and Matthew appear together in 6 published lists, across 253 years of shared records. Matthew held the stronger position in more years in 4 of them, Mark in 2.

The order between them changed and held in 3 of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Mark reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 4 of those lists, Matthew in 1. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

How this pair is related

The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.

  • One moved ahead of the other

    In 1972, Matthew moved ahead of Mark in New South Wales, Australia · Boys — #5 and #7 the year before became #7 and #4.

  • Repeatedly exchanged positions

    Mark and Matthew changed places 14 times in Norway · Boys between 1966 and 2023, ending at #371 and #421.

  • Closest over the longest run

    Across 45 shared years in New South Wales, Australia · Boys, Mark and Matthew averaged 30.1 places apart, ending at #90 and #7.

  • Longest-running competitions

    Mark and Matthew were both ranked in New South Wales, Australia · Boys for 45 years, from 1957 to 2001, ending at #90 and #7.

  • Peaked in the same years

    Both reached their highest recorded position in England and Wales · Boys within 2 years — Mark #55 in 1996, Matthew #6 in 1996.

List by list

  • Republic of Ireland · Boys62 shared years, 19642025

    Mark held the stronger position in 38 of those years, Matthew in 24.

    Highest recorded here: Mark #7 in 1974, Matthew #15 in 2007.

    The order changed in 2002: Matthew moved ahead. In 2001 they stood at #16 and #22; by 2002 that had become #22 and #17.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Mark #99, Matthew #55.

  • Norway · Boys47 shared years, 19662023

    Mark held the stronger position in 35 of those years, Matthew in 12.

    Highest recorded here: Mark #211 in 1970, Matthew #267 in 1985.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2023: Mark #371, Matthew #421.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Boys45 shared years, 19572001

    Mark held the stronger position in 15 of those years, Matthew in 30.

    Highest recorded here: Mark #2 in 1960, Matthew #1 in 1982.

    The order changed in 1972: Matthew moved ahead. In 1971 they stood at #5 and #7; by 1972 that had become #7 and #4.

    Most recent shared year, 2001: Mark #90, Matthew #7.

  • New Zealand · Boys42 shared years, 19582000

    Mark held the stronger position in 19 of those years, Matthew in 23.

    Highest recorded here: Mark #2 in 1974, Matthew #1 in 1990.

    The order changed in 1978: Matthew moved ahead. In 1977 they stood at #5 and #7; by 1978 that had become #8 and #5.

    Most recent shared year, 2000: Mark #89, Matthew #5.

  • England and Wales · Boys29 shared years, 19962024

    Mark held the stronger position in 0 of those years, Matthew in 29.

    Highest recorded here: Mark #55 in 1996, Matthew #6 in 1996.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2024: Mark #277, Matthew #149.

  • Northern Ireland · Boys28 shared years, 19972024

    Mark held the stronger position in 0 of those years, Matthew in 28.

    Highest recorded here: Mark #12 in 1999, Matthew #1 in 1997.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2024: Mark #177, Matthew #42.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Mark, Matthew
FieldMarkMatthew
Record typeEditorially researched profileEditorially researched profile
Gender usagemalemale
MeaningA form of the Latin name Marcus used in several languages. Saint Mark authored the second Gospel and is patron saint of Venice.From Greek Matthaios, from Hebrew Mattithiah, combining 'mattat' (gift) with 'Yahweh' — 'gift of God'. Matthew was a tax collector and one of the twelve apostles, traditionally credited as author of the first Gospel.
OriginLatinBiblical Hebrew
Pronunciation/ˈmɑɹk//ˈmæθ.juː/
Syllables12
Common variants / nicknamesNot yet recordedNot yet recorded
Recorded regional usageAU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZAU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZ
Most recent popularity observationRepublic of Ireland · Boys #99 (2025)Republic of Ireland · Boys #55 (2025)
Pronunciation clarity (demonstration score)90/10090/100
Spelling simplicity (demonstration score)95/10082/100
International familiarity (demonstration score)100/100100/100
Data Confidencemediummedium

What the data shows

  • Mark is recorded with a Latin origin, while Matthew is recorded with a Biblical Hebrew origin.
  • Mark has 1 syllable, compared with 2 for Matthew.
  • Mark's recorded meaning differs from Matthew's — see the table above for each.
  • Both names have recorded usage in AU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZ.

How each name got here

Mark

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1950

    First recorded at #362 among boys in Norway in 1950 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Norway · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1952–2001

    Highest recorded position: #2 among boys in New South Wales, Australia, in 1960 (recorded 1952–2001).

    New South Wales, Australia · Boys

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #286 among boys in Norway, in 2025.

    Norway · Boys

Matthew

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1957

    First recorded at #78 among boys in New South Wales, Australia in 1957 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    New South Wales, Australia · Boys

  2. Highest recorded1957–2023

    Highest recorded position: #1 among boys in New South Wales, Australia, in 1982 (recorded 1957–2023).

    New South Wales, Australia · Boys

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #55 among boys in Republic of Ireland, in 2025.

    Republic of Ireland · Boys