Aimee-Rose

femaleStatistical record

What official birth registration shows about Aimee-Rose: which national registrars published it, in which years, and how its recorded position changed.

No researched meaning, origin or pronunciation yet — what that means.

Aimee-Rose: Recorded since 2004, it reached #444 in 2011, and it was last ranked in 2017.

2registrars recorded it
13times a registrar ranked it
14years from first to last
#444highest recorded position
4groupings it qualifies for

Region

Falling

among girls in England and Wales · 2004–2017

View as table

England and Wales · Girls rank by year
Year	Rank
2004	#4598
2005	#3382
2006	#5061
2008	#5545
2009	#3031
2011	#5785
2012	#3681
2013	#5742
2014	#5691
2015	#5730
2016	#4763
2017	#4763

VerifiedSource: Office for National Statistics — Baby Names in England and Wales.Confidence: high.

See all England and Wales names · Source: Office for National Statistics — Baby Names in England and Wales

What the data shows

FallingEngland and Wales · Girls

Recorded in official data among girls in England and Wales in 12 of the 14 years from 2004 to 2017.

In 2011: #444 among girls in Northern Ireland, #5785 among girls in England and Wales.

Official data from 2 national registrars across 2 regions, 2004–2017 · Office for National Statistics. Data sources

Popularity journey

First recorded2004
First recorded at #4598 among girls in England and Wales in 2004 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.
England and Wales · Girls
Most recent2017
Most recently recorded at #4763 among girls in England and Wales, in 2017.
England and Wales · Girls

Aimee-Rose appears in

Groupings this name qualifies for under their own stated rules, from the same official statistics shown above.

Popularity data

Official popularity data is available for 2 regions, from 2004 to 2017. Highest recorded position: #444 in Northern Ireland in 2011.

Aimee-Rose's recorded popularity observations by year, region and administrative category, including rank, registered births, source confidence and when each region's data was last reviewed.
Year	Region	Category	Rank	Births registered	Confidence	Status
2017	England and Wales	female	#4763	4	High	Verified
2016	England and Wales	female	#4763	4	High	Verified
2015	England and Wales	female	#5730	3	High	Verified
2014	England and Wales	female	#5691	3	High	Verified
2013	England and Wales	female	#5742	3	High	Verified
2012	England and Wales	female	#3681	6	High	Verified
2011	England and Wales	female	#5785	3	High	Verified
2009	England and Wales	female	#3031	7	High	Verified
2008	England and Wales	female	#5545	3	High	Verified
2006	England and Wales	female	#5061	3	High	Verified
2005	England and Wales	female	#3382	5	High	Verified
2004	England and Wales	female	#4598	3	High	Verified
2011	Northern Ireland	female	#444	3	High	Verified

England and Wales hub — collected by Office for National Statistics
Northern Ireland hub — collected by NISRA

See methodology and data sources for how popularity data is collected and what "confidence" means.

What the record shows

Recorded by 2 registrars between 2004 and 2017, ranked in 12 years of that period.

Its highest recorded position is #444, first reached in 2011.

Its largest count from any one registrar is 7 births, registered in England and Wales in 2009.

Its record falls into 3 separate stretches, with a longest absence of 1 year.

A second registrar first ranked it in 2011, and 7 years separate the first registrar to record it from the last.

Every figure here is counted from the seven official registrars Namewise holds. A position is only ever a place within the list that published it, and a record that thins or stops is a fact about what registrars printed — never about how many children received the name.

2decades with a ranked yearRecorded in 2 decades →
7 yearslongest unbroken run of ranked years
3separate stretches the record falls into3 separate stretches →
1 yearlongest absence inside the recorded periodA single year missing →
#4,763position in 2017, its most recent recorded year
7 yearsyears between the first and last registrar to record itAcross 6 to 10 years →
7births registered in its largest year, 2009Under 25 births →

Where to go next

Records with a comparable body of evidence, so the catalogue can be read outward from this one. Each group states the rule it was selected by.

Next in the catalogue

The records either side of this one alphabetically.

Aimee-Leigh · #212, 21y
Aimee-Louise · #419, 17y
Aimen · #1807, 25y
Aimie · #282, 26y

A comparable record

Records held by the same 2 registrars, over a similar number of ranked years, whose highest position is closest to this one. A similar body of evidence — never a claim that the names themselves are alike.

Miley-Rose · #444, 16y
Miruna · #444, 16y
Evanas · #443, 15y
Rares · #443, 17y

Also first recorded in the 2000s

Records whose earliest ranking in Namewise's registrar data also falls between 2000 and 2009.

Cailyn · #444, 15y
Lorelai · #444, 17y
Miley-Rose · #444, 16y
Miruna · #444, 16y

Aimee-Rose was ranked #444 in Northern Ireland · Girls in 2011. These are the names immediately either side of it on that published list — a fact about the registrar's own output, not a similarity judgement.

Aimee-Rose and the names beside it

Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale, in the same year, by the same registrar — so these are positions that genuinely passed each other, not a similarity judgement. Drawn from the 2,573 names with a recorded popularity standing (common, familiar, uncommon), so a name outside that set could have passed Aimee-Rose without appearing here.

Aimee-Rose moved ahead of

Ellinor Compare
In 2011 they stood at #5785 and #3185 in England and Wales · Girls; by 2012 that had become #3681 and #5876.
Belinda Compare
In 2015 they stood at #5730 and #2945 in England and Wales · Girls; by 2016 that had become #4763 and #5785.
Finlay Compare
In 2015 they stood at #5742 and #5742 in England and Wales · Girls; by 2016 that had become #4763 and #5785.
Geraldine Compare
In 2015 they stood at #5691 and #4684 in England and Wales · Girls; by 2016 that had become #4763 and #5785.

Moved ahead of Aimee-Rose

Hayden Compare
In 2007 they stood at #3382 and #3970 in England and Wales · Girls; by 2008 that had become #5545 and #878.
Blake Compare
In 2010 they stood at #3031 and #3936 in England and Wales · Girls; by 2011 that had become #5785 and #2893.
Francis Compare
In 2012 they stood at #3681 and #4838 in England and Wales · Girls; by 2013 that had become #5742 and #4739.

What's not yet available

Meaning
Origin
Pronunciation
Nicknames and spelling variants

Absence from this list does not mean the name isn't genuinely meaningful or widely used — only that Namewise hasn't sourced and reviewed that content yet. Absence from a specific year or geography above does not prove zero use there either; official statistics only publish names above a minimum threshold.

Official popularity data is available for 2 regions, from 2004 to 2017. Highest recorded position: #444 in Northern Ireland in 2011. Source data last verified 2026-07-22.

Aimee-Rose

Aimee-Rose at a glance

What the data shows

Popularity journey

Aimee-Rose appears in

Popularity data

What the record shows

Where to go next

Next in the catalogue

A comparable record

Also first recorded in the 2000s

Names published alongside Aimee-Rose

Aimee-Rose and the names beside it

Aimee-Rose moved ahead of

Moved ahead of Aimee-Rose

Aimee-Rose at a glance

Aimee-Rose appears in

What the record shows

Where to go next

Next in the catalogue

A comparable record

Also first recorded in the 2000s

Names published alongside Aimee-Rose

Aimee-Rose and the names beside it

Aimee-Rose moved ahead of

Moved ahead of Aimee-Rose