Namewise

Chloe vs Matilda

Chloe and Matilda compared on official birth-registration statistics and Namewise's recorded data. This page states what each name's record shows — it never picks a winner or scores one name against the other.

Head to head

Ranks are only compared within one published list and one year. Two ranks from different years, from a boys' and a girls' list, or from different registrars are not comparable, so they are not placed side by side.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Girls

    In 2025, Chloe was ranked #7 and Matilda #16 among girls in New South Wales, Australia.

  • England and Wales · Girls

    In 2025, Chloe was ranked #89 and Matilda #19 among girls in England and Wales.

  • Republic of Ireland · Girls

    In 2025, Chloe was ranked #22 and Matilda #106 among girls in Republic of Ireland.

  • New Zealand · Girls

    In 2023, Chloe was ranked #23 and Matilda #27 among girls in New Zealand.

  • Scotland · Girls

    In 2024, Chloe was ranked #39 and Matilda #148 among girls in Scotland.

  • Northern Ireland · Girls

    In 2024, Chloe was ranked #105 and Matilda #110 among girls in Northern Ireland.

  • Norway · Girls

    In 2025, Chloe was ranked #341 and Matilda #150 among girls in Norway.

Chloe and Matilda over time

England and Wales · Girls
#1#3#10#30#10019962025Chloe #89Matilda #191996: Chloe #2, Matilda #2111997: Chloe #1, Matilda #1771998: Chloe #1, Matilda #1741999: Chloe #1, Matilda #1582000: Chloe #1, Matilda #1432001: Chloe #1, Matilda #1362002: Chloe #1, Matilda #1272003: Chloe #3, Matilda #1222004: Chloe #5, Matilda #1072005: Chloe #6, Matilda #892006: Chloe #7, Matilda #702007: Chloe #7, Matilda #622008: Chloe #6, Matilda #432009: Chloe #3, Matilda #462010: Chloe #8, Matilda #532011: Chloe #12, Matilda #482012: Chloe #16, Matilda #472013: Chloe #18, Matilda #362014: Chloe #19, Matilda #362015: Chloe #18, Matilda #272016: Chloe #23, Matilda #252017: Chloe #32, Matilda #272018: Chloe #36, Matilda #312019: Chloe #39, Matilda #302020: Chloe #46, Matilda #292021: Chloe #52, Matilda #282022: Chloe #58, Matilda #292023: Chloe #65, Matilda #302024: Chloe #72, Matilda #312025: Chloe #89, Matilda #19

Higher on the chart is a stronger position. The scale is logarithmic, so the gap from #1 to #10 is drawn as large as the gap from #100 to #1,000.

Republic of Ireland · Girls
#10#30#100#30019742025Chloe #22Matilda #1061974: Chloe #490, Matilda #4901987: Chloe #160, Matilda #4881997: Chloe #9, Matilda #4962001: Chloe #4, Matilda #4002002: Chloe #5, Matilda #4062003: Chloe #8, Matilda #4902004: Chloe #8, Matilda #5112005: Chloe #8, Matilda #5232006: Chloe #14, Matilda #2602007: Chloe #15, Matilda #2412008: Chloe #9, Matilda #2062009: Chloe #10, Matilda #2242010: Chloe #9, Matilda #2052011: Chloe #9, Matilda #1942012: Chloe #15, Matilda #1422013: Chloe #13, Matilda #1342014: Chloe #14, Matilda #1422015: Chloe #9, Matilda #1462016: Chloe #17, Matilda #972017: Chloe #10, Matilda #1062018: Chloe #16, Matilda #1202019: Chloe #15, Matilda #1272020: Chloe #17, Matilda #1322021: Chloe #12, Matilda #1042022: Chloe #23, Matilda #1282023: Chloe #20, Matilda #1222024: Chloe #20, Matilda #1102025: Chloe #22, Matilda #106

Higher on the chart is a stronger position. The scale is logarithmic, so the gap from #1 to #10 is drawn as large as the gap from #100 to #1,000.

Chloe and Matilda over time

Chloe and Matilda appear together in 5 published lists, across 114 years of shared records. Chloe held the stronger position in more years in 5 of them, Matilda in 0.

The order between them changed and held in 2 of those lists — a change in that published list, never a claim that one name displaced the other.

Chloe reached its own highest recorded position earlier in 5 of those lists, and Matilda in none. Each position is a place inside its own list, so this compares when they peaked and never how high.

Counted list by list. Two names in the same published list are measured on the same scale in the same year, so those comparisons are real — but positions from different lists are not, so nothing here is combined into an overall standing.

How this pair is related

The relationship kinds these two qualify for, each under its own stated rule. Every one is drawn from a list they both appear in.

  • One moved ahead of the other

    In 2017, Matilda moved ahead of Chloe in England and Wales · Girls — #23 and #25 the year before became #32 and #27.

  • Closest over the longest run

    Across 22 shared years in New South Wales, Australia · Girls, Chloe and Matilda averaged 17.3 places apart, ending at #7 and #16.

  • Mirrored each other

    Over 22 shared years in New South Wales, Australia · Girls, Matilda rose about as far as Chloe fell — from #3 and #81 in 2004 to #7 and #16 in 2025.

  • Longest-running competitions

    Chloe and Matilda were both ranked in England and Wales · Girls for 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, ending at #89 and #19.

List by list

  • England and Wales · Girls30 shared years, 1996–2025

    Chloe held the stronger position in 21 of those years, Matilda in 9.

    Highest recorded here: Chloe #1 in 1997, Matilda #19 in 2025.

    The order changed in 2017: Matilda moved ahead. In 2016 they stood at #23 and #25; by 2017 that had become #32 and #27.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Chloe #89, Matilda #19.

  • Republic of Ireland · Girls28 shared years, 1974–2025

    Chloe held the stronger position in 27 of those years, Matilda in 0.

    Highest recorded here: Chloe #4 in 2001, Matilda #97 in 2016.

    The order changed in 1987: Chloe moved ahead. In 1986 they stood at #490 and #490; by 1987 that had become #160 and #488.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Chloe #22, Matilda #106.

  • New South Wales, Australia · Girls22 shared years, 2004–2025

    Chloe held the stronger position in 20 of those years, Matilda in 2.

    Highest recorded here: Chloe #1 in 2006, Matilda #8 in 2022.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2025: Chloe #7, Matilda #16.

  • Northern Ireland · Girls20 shared years, 2004–2024

    Chloe held the stronger position in 20 of those years, Matilda in 0.

    Highest recorded here: Chloe #6 in 2011, Matilda #91 in 2017.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2024: Chloe #105, Matilda #110.

  • New Zealand · Girls14 shared years, 2009–2023

    Chloe held the stronger position in 14 of those years, Matilda in 0.

    Highest recorded here: Chloe #8 in 2010, Matilda #20 in 2021.

    The order between them never changed and held in this list.

    Most recent shared year, 2023: Chloe #23, Matilda #27.

Two names moving past each other in a ranking is a fact about the ranking. Namewise does not claim one name displaced the other, that families chose between them, or that either influenced the other — none of that is in this data.

Where to go next

Comparisons that share a name, a rule or a published list with this one. Each is an existing comparison page with its own evidence — nothing here says these pairs are alike.

Other comparisons involving Chloe

Pairs where Chloe shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

Other comparisons involving Matilda

Pairs where Matilda shares a published list with another name, each measured inside one registrar's own list.

  • Matilda vs Layla

    Matilda and Layla both rose over the same years in 5 registrars — England and Wales · Girls; New South Wales, Australia · Girls; New Zealand · Girls; Northern Ireland · Girls; Republic of Ireland · Girls. Each list is measured against its own starting position; the positions are never combined.

    Matilda · Layla · 30 shared years, 1996–2025 · Moved together in several countries

  • Mia vs Matilda

    Mia and Matilda both rose over the same years in 5 registrars — England and Wales · Girls; New South Wales, Australia · Girls; New Zealand · Girls; Northern Ireland · Girls; Republic of Ireland · Girls. Each list is measured against its own starting position; the positions are never combined.

    Mia · Matilda · 31 shared years, 1987–2025 · Moved together in several countries

  • Charlotte vs Matilda

    Charlotte and Matilda both rose over the same years in 4 registrars — New South Wales, Australia · Girls; New Zealand · Girls; Northern Ireland · Girls; Republic of Ireland · Girls. Each list is measured against its own starting position; the positions are never combined.

    Charlotte · Matilda · 33 shared years, 1965–2025 · Moved together in several countries

  • Matilda vs Daisy

    Matilda and Daisy both rose over the same years in 4 registrars — England and Wales · Girls; New Zealand · Girls; Northern Ireland · Girls; Republic of Ireland · Girls. Each list is measured against its own starting position; the positions are never combined.

    Matilda · Daisy · 30 shared years, 1996–2025 · Moved together in several countries

Other pairs with the same kind of relationship

Pairs that qualify under the same rule as this one — close in one country, far apart in another.

All close in one country, far apart in another →

Other pairs ranked together in the 2020s

Pairs both ranked in the same published list at some point between 2020 and 2029.

The 2020s across all registrars →

Side by side

Side-by-side comparison of Chloe, Matilda
FieldChloeMatilda
Record typeEditorially researched profileEditorially researched profile
Gender usagefemalefemale
MeaningCommonly interpreted as 'green shoot', referring to new plant growth in spring; used as an epithet of the Greek goddess Demeter.Commonly interpreted as 'strength in battle' or 'mighty in battle'.
OriginAncient GreekGermanic
Pronunciation/ˈkloʊi//məˈtɪldə/
Syllables13
Common variants / nicknamesNot yet recordedTilly, Mathilde
Recorded regional usageNew South Wales, Australia, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Republic of Ireland, Norway, New ZealandNew South Wales, Australia, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Republic of Ireland, Norway, New Zealand
Most recent popularity observationNew South Wales, Australia · Girls #7 (2025)New South Wales, Australia · Girls #16 (2025)
Data Confidencemediumhigh

What the data shows

  • Chloe is recorded with a Ancient Greek origin, while Matilda is recorded with a Germanic origin.
  • Chloe has 1 syllable, compared with 3 for Matilda.
  • Chloe's recorded meaning differs from Matilda's — see the table above for each.
  • Both names have recorded usage in AU-NSW, GB-ENW, GB-NIR, GB-SCT, IE, NO, NZ.
  • The available evidence gives Chloe a "medium" Data Confidence level and Matilda a "high" level — this reflects how complete and corroborated the underlying evidence is, not a judgement of either name.

How each name got here

Chloe

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1974

    First recorded at #490 among girls in Republic of Ireland in 1974 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Republic of Ireland · Girls

  2. Highest recorded1996–2025

    Highest recorded position: #1 among girls in England and Wales, in 1997 (recorded 1996–2025).

    England and Wales · Girls

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #89 among girls in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Girls

Matilda

Popularity journey

  1. First recorded1965

    First recorded at #325 among girls in Republic of Ireland in 1965 — the earliest year that source publishes this name, not necessarily the earliest it was used.

    Republic of Ireland · Girls

  2. Highest recorded2004–2025

    Highest recorded position: #8 among girls in New South Wales, Australia, in 2022 (recorded 2004–2025).

    New South Wales, Australia · Girls

  3. Most recent2025

    Most recently recorded at #19 among girls in England and Wales, in 2025.

    England and Wales · Girls